Apple is Sending Your Fingerprints to the NSA

It has recently been revealed that Apple is selling all of its users out.  The new finger print scanner that was put in the iPhone 5s was developed by Authentec whose director, Robert E Grady, was a prominent figure within the George Bush administration and is connected with The Carlyle Group, which is a majority shareholder in Booz Allen Hamilton, the NSA contractor with which whistleblower Edward Snowden worked.

Apple’s TouchID technology, reportedly has strong ties to “the most powerful and corrupt Defense Department and Intelligence Community contractors and figures.”

“Ye’ be warned” -DPR

The Systematic Destruction of the Nuclear Family [CORRUPTION]

Nuclear Family > Single Parent

Statistically, the biggest predictor of family economic status is not race or geography, but whether households are headed by one parent or two. That’s why a family headed by a single white mother is nearly three times more likely to be poor than a family headed by married black parents. In fact, among all children living with a single mom, well more than a third live in poverty.

Overwhelmingly, one-adult teams occur because two involved parents tried to be a family, but fell apart. Until we address the reality of family breakup and find a way to help, we can’t effectively fight that key cause of family poverty. Today, 41 percent of US babies are born to unmarried mothers – but it’s inaccurate and misleading to call them all single mothers.As shown in a leading study, most unmarried mothers (82 percent) are still romantically involved with the baby’s father when the baby is born, in most cases living together, and the two parents hope and intend to raise their child together. So, in reality, for every 10 American babies, on average, six are born to a married couple, three to an unmarried but involved couple, and only one to a mother not romantically involved with the baby’s father. This presents an important opportunity. Studies show that when parents stay together, most families benefit. Parents tend to get and hold jobs, family wealth increases, kids do better in school, and family members generally report better health and happiness than in single-parent families. Communities gain through higher tax revenue and lower social costs. (excerpt above from http://www.csmonitor.com/)

This bring about a very important question. HOW CAN WE HELP COUPLE WITH NEWLY BORN CHILDREN STAY TOGETHER?

We spend billions on trying to help out single parents with food stamps, welfare, free child care, etc. but we spend almost nothing on helping parents stay together. If the benefits of a 2 parent households are so great than an increase in nuclear families would drop these welfare costs way down. Why are we always so reactionary? We treat the symptom instead of treating the cause. (This is true for our healthcare system as well but that a whole other store.)

Since 2009 (the start of the “Great Recession”) the wealth gap in the USA has grown at an alarming rate. For members of the 1% income has increased by 18% over between 2009 and 2012, for the rest of us a measly 1.8% increase in income. Many think this is a reason to raise taxes and redistribute the wealth to the rest of the country. Most economist even believe a 1% that controls a smaller portions of the wealth (lets say 45%) in a faster growing economy (due to consumer spending which is 70% of our economy) means more money for everyone, including the 1%ers themselves.

So if nuclear families provide greater prosperity for the USA why have we been trending in the other direct? Why would the the people in control be resisting the opportunity to make more money and pay less taxes?

It all comes down to one thing… CONTROL.

Since the late 60’s the war against the family has been raging and the casualties have been high. As stated before almost half of all new born babies are entering into the world without a full nuclear family in place. Many people ask how is this happening? I thought we took steps to fix this with abortion, birth control, sex ED class, etc.?

When all of the aforementioned steps were taken to fix un-wed pregnancies they happened at a lessor effect. Many believe these things actually have lead to an increase in the problem. Its like the TheTruth.com commercial on TV. (if you don’t know these were the anti smoking campaign run by big tobacco as part of their settlement for selling cancer sticks). After the ad campaign had run for several years an independent study was done to see if they were having any effect on lowering teen smoking. The study found it was actually having the opposite effect. Turns out a whole bunch of commercials with people saying the word smoking in it just increased people curiosity and made even more of them give it a try. Many people believe this was the intention of the ads by big tobacco from the get go.

This same logic can be applied to the safe sex, birth control, condoms, abortion, propaganda. It was supposed to make everything better and all it has done is crush the family. I believe the same logic to the tobacco applies, THIS WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT. This gets us back to my reasoning, CONTROL. There are a few things most people can rationalize about this type of control. First the more people who are in one parent households the more of them are poor and poor people are easier to control. Second poor people are on government programs (welfare etc.) which the government hands out so they are basically at the mercy of the USA government. IF the government was to say we have to do this our we will have to cut your welfare, then all of the people dependent on welfare are instantly on the side of that governmental decision because people don’t want to lose their benefits.

However I have a 3rd and more sinister reason for destroying the Nuclear family. ISOLATION. It is part of the government interrogation process. It has been studied in great depth, and has even been considered torture in some countries. What do we do to a criminal who we can’t fully control? What do we do to a terrorist we are trying to scare into giving us information? Its the one constant we keep across how we react to all of our enemies. ISOLATION. Its rooted in the subconscious of all humans. We are social creatures and it is psychologically damaging to isolate us. People who feel like they are alone or don’t fit in are the easiest to control. At very young ages the out cast of a class tends to be the easiest student to manipulate into getting into trouble. this has been proven time and time again over many studies. Most people consider it common knowledge. It is the perfect weapon of control. It has been blasted into pop culture with music, TV, Media, and now social media. (new studies show those who use Facebook on a regular basis are twice as likely to feel isolated than those who don’t, Google it) And what is the one place where all people feel like they belong, in their nuclear family. It was the logical next target. Without the family there is no safe harbor to be yourself and not have to worry about receiving cultural backlash. It is a place to learn and to grow with moral fiber, and it is being OBLITERATED right before our eyes.

TO FIX THE PROBLEMS WITH SOCIETY WE NEED TO FIX THE FAMILY.

This all seems well and good but when you actually look at it, you realize how daunting a task it will be. I offer a few ideas on how we can start heading in the right direction.

1.) Remove barriers to marriage. Many new parents decide – sometimes even the very day a child is born – that they want to marry, or at least to have the father legally acknowledge paternity. While not magically creating a stable family, these decisions offer legal protections and practical benefits.Yet, in most states, these tools are not easily available to new parents. Marriage may require a trip to a courthouse, payment of a license fee, a waiting period, a blood test, and a second trip to a judge or pastor. Procedures to acknowledge paternity may be obscure and legalistic. A couple who already has a mutual child and is eager to formalize their family, is making a responsible choice that should be encouraged. There are many simple ways to help them, such as streamlining marriage and paternity laws, and making marriage licenses and paternity forms available at all birthing hospitals. BRING BACK THE TAX BREAK FOR GETTING MARRIED, IN FACT MAKE IT EVEN BIGGER SO PEOPLE HAVE A STRONG FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO GET MARRIED.

2.) Teach relationship classes. Along with sex ed. We spend so much time on teach children how to have safe sex, but we never teach the about when to have sex, why to have sex, or how to have a strong healthy relationship. If being part of a nuclear family is the largest factor for being poor or not poor how can we leave this out of our children’s education.

3.) Family propaganda. Where are the shows on TV about a strong nuclear family? Why aren’t dads heroes anymore? How about a song about being happily married? Sending a positive message to media can make wanting a nuclear family cool again. There is no need to always have such poor messages on main stream media.

4.) Be a good example for your kids. This may be the biggest issue, that is PARENTS NOT WANTING TO BE PARENTS. If you are parent please realize you are raising the future of the world. I know its tough and no one is perfect, but if you find yourself making life changing decisions based on what YOU WANT INSTEAD OF WHATS BEST FOR YOUR CHILD STOP IT. You gave them life and brought them into the worlds. They are your own flesh and blood and nothing should ever be more important to you than them. I can’t tell you how much it breaks my heart every time I hear a story about a parent neglecting their children. IT IS YOUR DUTY TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT FOR YOUR KIDS IT IS NOT OPTIONAL. Also if you see a parent doing something like this, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. Either say something yourself or call the cops. The absence of a good deed in the face of evil is evil itself. Remember that.

Ok. That’s all I have for you, but if you want to read more about trends causing the colaps of the family check out some links below.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/0130/Behind-the-falling-US-birthrate-too-much-student-debt-to-afford-kids

http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2013/0130/To-fight-wealth-gap-save-the-family/(page)

http://www.nikk.no/The+decline+and+fall+of+the+nuclear+family+presents+no+menace+to+the+couple+norm.b7C_wlfYWE.ips

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=99864

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/6686407/Nuclear-family-is-broken-warns-parents-group.html

http://prairiestarms.libguides.com/content.php?pid=392772&sid=3217316

http://theresurgence.com/2011/07/12/the-decline-of-the-nuclear-family

Post about social media

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/05/is-facebook-making-us-lonely/308930/

http://www.dailytech.com/Facebook+Envy+Leads+to+Depression+for+Some/article29723.htm

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/facebook/too-much-facebook-time-leads-to-depression-in-girls/11115

 

Invisible Children Charity Leader Spends Your Donations on Crazy Drugs. [CORRUPTION]

So I am sorry to share this all with you but it looks like millions of people have been tricked by this douche…

He founded Invisible Children which is a charity that takes “donations” to try and prevent children from become an African Child Soldier.

However only a small amount of your money ever makes it to the CHILDREN. The rest goes to the founders crazy drug habit.

Below is a video by a TM reporter who saw this guy The Founder Of Invisible Children, running down the street naked on some sort of crazy drug high.

This is what your donations to invisible children went to…

Looks like 7 millions dollars scammed out of good natured people can get you pretty messed up on drugs.

For the full story check the link below

Kony leaders Arrested.

The True Faces Of Apple

Next time you are playing temple run, or listening to a new cd from itunes, or showing off the latests fad feature iOS has provided you think about these faces.

These are the true faces of Apple. These are the faces of the workers who were painfully burned do to dangerous procedures they were forced to do, while making your phone/tablet.

Picture originally from link below.
http://m.gizmodo.com/5892669/ipad-workers-faces-still-ruined-after-last-years-explosion

The EVIL Empire [APPLE]

For those of you who still LOVE APPLE:

You are supporting a company who deceives the world to make billions while they trample the lives of millions who make their products. 

I always thought Apple fan boys/girls had a decent understanding  of being socially responsible. Many I think thought by buying Apple (a usa owned company) they thought they were helping America.

Well the truth is out Apple kills jobs in the USA and is killing their own employees around the world.

How Apple is pulling the shade o er their human rights violations.

To all the business owners out there pay close attention to this company. The secrets to your profits are coming into the light.

Secret #1 – How to make $100 billion in profits.

Answer – pay foreign suppliers (FOXCONN) to do your dirty work for you, sell a product that was made on the cheap, by the blood, tears, and inhuman treatment of these foreign employees and sell it to Stupid Americans who think you have cool commercials and “pretty” software.

Below is a repose to all of the Apple fanboy hate I have been receiving since I posted this article. It is a direct response to one of the comments below but it applies to many emails, comments, and hangouts I have been sent.

“So normally I approve comments without posting any opinions to them but this time this reader just missed the point, so I figured I would clarify why it is such a big deal for Apple to use a supplier who treats their employees this poorly.

Apple is an American company and the most valued company in the world currently. By using a supplier that treats its employees so badly, they had to install suicide nets to keep their employees from killing themselves, Apple is setting a terrible example to other fortune 500 companies. By supporting Apple you are condoning the inhumane treatment of human beings to increase corporate profits.

I agree a phone blowing up in someones ear is a scary ordeal but it pales in comparison to setting such an evil moral standard for profitability.”

ELECTION PROTEST [democracy]

USE THE WRITE IN CANDIDATE SPACE WHEN VOTING TO PROTEST THE ELECTION.

So as this election year has been taking shape in the first month of the year, I have noticed one common thread throughout all discussions of the coming election. That idea is this:

WHEN WILL A QUALIFIED CANDIDATE EMERGE AS A LEGITIMATE CONTENDER FOR THE PRESIDENCY?

Well I dare to ask you a tougher question:

WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME A QUALIFIED CANDIDATE EXISTED?

Now this may seem like a strange question to ask for some of the older or younger voters in my audience but I truly mean the question in its most literal form. When was the last time anyone was truly excited about supporting either presidential candidate.

I feel as if we have been forced to choose between a TURD SANDWICH and a GIANT DOUCHE in every election for the last 25 years. (Sorry South Park, I borrowed your idea).

However I do not believe abstaining from the vote is the best way to protest having to choose between the lesser of two evils.

I say we organize an ELECTION PROTEST. Where everyone who doesn’t like either candidate goes out to vote, and even encourages others who feel the same way to come and vote. The trick is who they will be voting for.  The protest will be recognized by using the write in candidacy space and choosing to vote for neither of the current runners for either major party. Instead write in the name of your favorite historical president. Or any other derogatory name of your choosing bashing the candidates or mocking the election processes.

Please feel free to leave suggested write in options below. I will officially support my favorite option a week before the election.

Down with SOPA. [PROTEST]!!!

Keep the internet free don’t allow SOPA to pass. PROTEST!!!

Take pride in your citizenship and fight for your freedom.

If you live in a closet or don’t know how to turn on a computer you probably haven’t heard a of this evil little law that is designed to destroy the last REAL bit of freedom the world has…

…THE INTERNET.

check the link below for more info.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/01/wikipedia-blackout-sopa-and-pipa-explained/

Facebook is Illegally Tracking You, And Don’t Let Anyone Tell You It Doesn’t Matter! [CORRUPTION]

That thumbs down goes to you Gizmodo.

So the article below is from Gizmodo [Is Facebook Tacking You?], but i am starting to questions the legitimacy of their website.  This article is a paid for piece of advertisement, written as a PR cover up for Facebook.  The people at Facebook, have been breaking privacy laws and tracking your web activity without your knowledge for years.  Then they state that if you are paranoid about it clear your cookies, but this does not actually work to remove the facebook tracking bug.  I actually had to find a hidden .dll files using CCleaner in order to get rid of the tracking software.  In my opinion that mean this is a malicious cookie and is definitely tracking you illegally.  So this next comment go to Gizmodo.

WHEN DID YOU GUYS SELL OUT AND START WRITING PUFF PIECES FOR MAJOR CORPORATIONS. THE INTEGRITY OF YOUR ENTIRE NEWS WEBSITE IS AT STAKE. SO CLEAN UP YOUR ACT, START DOING REAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM, AND STOP WRITING ARTICLES THAT HIDE THE TRUTH JUST FOR MONEY.  OTHERWISE YOU ARE NO BETTER THAN FOX NEWS OR ABC. For more on this check HERE

For the rest of you seriously consider deleting your Facebook account and cleaning your registry.  Facebook is quickly becoming an evil corporation and don’t support them with your business.

Is Facebook Tracking You After You Cancel Your Account? Does It Even Really Matter?

Citing employees at Hamburg Data Protection, Bloomberg claims that Facebook’s cookies will still actively track your online activity even if you’ve cancelled your account. But it mostly just seems like tin hat paranoia.

According to the report, there’s “suspicion” and over the way Facebook is using cookies. What that means exactly is unclear, as they don’t elaborate any further aside from saying that the cookies can identify specific people. Facebook says they delete any user specific cookies, but leave some for security purposes, such as phishing.

Remaining cookies are used in “identifying spammers and phishers, detecting when somebody unauthorized is trying to access your account, helping you get back into your account if you get hacked,” and blocking underage users from re-registering with a different birth date, Facebook said.

Should Facebook be doing this without people knowing? Probably not. But even if they are collecting data on you after you cancel your account, is it different from what any other website is doing? If these are supercookies, which are considerably harder to get rid of, then yeah, it’s problematic. But sites will drop a cookie on your computer and track your data even if you’re just visiting—regardless of whether or not you have an account.

This instance doesn’t seem to be much different. Sure, Facebook has data about us that is much more focused and specific, but if you’re that paranoid about it, clear out your cookies. [Bloomberg]

USA Government Executes USA Citizen Without A Trial Or Due Process [CORRUPTION]

I KNOW WHATS COMING. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TELL ME ITS OKAY BECUASE HE WAS A TERRORIST.  HE WAS RESPONCIBLE FOR THE DEATH OF AMERICANS ETC ETC, I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU ARE COMING FROM.  THERE IS A VERY SLIM CHANCE HE DID NOT DESERVE TO DIE.  BUT HOW CAN WE BE SURE IF THERE WAS NEVER A TRIAL. THE ONLY THING THAT CAN BE PROVEN NOW IS THAT THSI GUY DIDN’T LIKE AMERICA AND SPOKE OUT AGAINST OUR GOVERNMENT, SO THE KILLED HIM. THIS IS A SCARY MOMENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY.  UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WE HAVE TAKEN TO ASSASSINATING CITIZENS WITHOUT A TRIAL. SOUNDS GOOD WHEN IT S A TERRORIST, UNTIL THEY CLAIM YOU ARE A TERRORIST OR SOMEONE YOU CARE ABOUT IS ONE. CHECK OUT THE STORY FROM WASHINGTON BELOW.

 

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s secret legal memorandum that opened the door to the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born radical Muslim cleric hiding in Yemen, found that it would be lawful only if it were not feasible to take him alive, according to people who have read the document.

Site Intelligence, via European Pressphoto Agency

Anwar al-Awlaki, a militant cleric who was an American citizen, was killed in Yemen.

 The memo, written last year, followed months of extensive interagency deliberations and offers a glimpse into the legal debate that led to one of the most significant decisions made by President Obama — to move ahead with the killing of an American citizen without a trial.

The secret document provided the justification for acting despite an executive order banning assassinations, a federal law against murder, protections in the Bill of Rights and various strictures of the international laws of war, according to people familiar with the analysis. The memo, however, was narrowly drawn to the specifics of Mr. Awlaki’s case and did not establish a broad new legal doctrine to permit the targeted killing of any Americans believed to pose a terrorist threat.

The Obama administration has refused to acknowledge or discuss its role in the drone strike that killed Mr. Awlaki last month and that technically remains a covert operation. The government has also resisted growing calls that it provide a detailed public explanation of why officials deemed it lawful to kill an American citizen, setting a precedent that scholars, rights activists and others say has raised concerns about the rule of law and civil liberties.

But the document that laid out the administration’s justification — a roughly 50-page memorandum by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, completed around June 2010 — was described on the condition of anonymity by people who have read it.

The legal analysis, in essence, concluded that Mr. Awlaki could be legally killed, if it was not feasible to capture him, because intelligence agencies said he was taking part in the war between the United States and Al Qaeda and posed a significant threat to Americans, as well as because Yemeni authorities were unable or unwilling to stop him.

The memorandum, which was written more than a year before Mr. Awlaki was killed, does not independently analyze the quality of the evidence against him.

The administration did not respond to requests for comment on this article.

The deliberations to craft the memo included meetings in the White House Situation Room involving top lawyers for the Pentagon, State Department, National Security Council and intelligence agencies.

It was principally drafted by David Barron and Martin Lederman, who were both lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel at the time, and was signed by Mr. Barron. The office may have given oral approval for an attack on Mr. Awlaki before completing its detailed memorandum. Several news reports before June 2010 quoted anonymous counterterrorism officials as saying that Mr. Awlaki had been placed on a kill-or-capture list around the time of the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner on Dec. 25, 2009. Mr. Awlaki wasaccused of helping to recruit the attacker for that operation.

Mr. Awlaki, who was born in New Mexico, was also accused of playing a role in a failed plot to bomb two cargo planes last year, part of a pattern of activities that counterterrorism officials have said showed that he had evolved from merely being a propagandist — in sermons justifying violence by Muslims against the United States — to playing an operational role in Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula’s continuing efforts to carry out terrorist attacks.

Other assertions about Mr. Awlaki included that he was a leader of the group, which had become a “cobelligerent” with Al Qaeda, and he was pushing it to focus on trying to attack the United States again. The lawyers were also told that capturing him alive among hostile armed allies might not be feasible if and when he were located.

Based on those premises, the Justice Department concluded that Mr. Awlaki was covered by the authorization to use military force against Al Qaeda that Congress enacted shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — meaning that he was a lawful target in the armed conflict unless some other legal prohibition trumped that authority.

It then considered possible obstacles and rejected each in turn.

Among them was an executive order that bans assassinations. That order, the lawyers found, blocked unlawful killings of political leaders outside of war, but not the killing of a lawful target in an armed conflict.

A federal statute that prohibits Americans from murdering other Americans abroad, the lawyers wrote, did not apply either, because it is not “murder” to kill a wartime enemy in compliance with the laws of war.

But that raised another pressing question: would it comply with the laws of war if the drone operator who fired the missile was a Central Intelligence Agency official, who, unlike a soldier, wore no uniform? The memorandum concluded that such a case would not be a war crime, although the operator might be in theoretical jeopardy of being prosecuted in a Yemeni court for violating Yemen’s domestic laws against murder, a highly unlikely possibility.

Then there was the Bill of Rights: the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee that a “person” cannot be seized by the government unreasonably, and the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee that the government may not deprive a person of life “without due process of law.”

The memo concluded that what was reasonable, and the process that was due, was different for Mr. Awlaki than for an ordinary criminal. It cited court cases allowing American citizens who had joined an enemy’s forces to be detained or prosecuted in a military court just like noncitizen enemies.

It also cited several other Supreme Court precedents, like a 2007 caseinvolving a high-speed chase and a 1985 case involving the shooting of a fleeing suspect, finding that it was constitutional for the police to take actions that put a suspect in serious risk of death in order to curtail an imminent risk to innocent people.

The document’s authors argued that “imminent” risks could include those by an enemy leader who is in the business of attacking the United States whenever possible, even if he is not in the midst of launching an attack at the precise moment he is located.

Facebook Plants Hidden Cookies On Your Computer That Track Your Usage And Page Viewing Even When You Are Logged Out [CREEPBOOK]

It’s no secret that Facebook and privacy have had some issues. Take today, for example. Thanks to a modified cookie, Facebook knows where you are online—even when you’re not logged into Facebook.

This article was originally posted  HERE »  but to my knowledge Facebook pressured the news media company who supports Gizmodo into pulling the article shortly after it was launched.